The Washington Post Went a Correction to Its Impairment Tale. Here’s Why It’s Nevertheless Incorrect.

<title>The Washington Post Went a Correction to Its Impairment Tale. Here’s Why It’s Nevertheless Incorrect. </title> <p>A week ago, TalkPoverty stated a few severe issues with The Washington Post’s present analysis of Social safety impairment advantages in rural America. Yesterday, The Post issued a modification alongside new calculations. Unfortuitously, you can still find major issues with their data—and their central thesis. </p> <p>First of all, The Post continues to over-count “working-age” beneficiaries by including over fifty percent a million individuals over 65—even including in certain those who are significantly more than 80 yrs. Old. Furthermore, as opposed to with the Census Bureau’s United states Community Survey (ACS)—what the Census calls “the leading source for step-by-step details about the American people”—The Post uses a far less frequent data set The CDC’s “Bridged-Race Population Estimates” data set was created for the true purpose of allowing “estimation and contrast of race-specific data. ” It really

Read More